A River Runs Through It - 753 Words

Being skeptical about this type of movie is normal, however, keep an open mind. It tells the story of two children growing up in rural Montana with a strict Minister father. Their father not only taught them the word of God and to put all their faith in their religion, but he also taught them to fly fish. Several times it is mentioned that the line between God and fly fishing was usually blurred or hard to find. Norman Maclean is the eldest son, he also appears to be the protagonist. The movie is in his point of view with an older version of himself providing voice overs as he reflects. The story starts when Norman and his younger brother Paul were children, but it spends most of the time when they are older. Both being out of college and fresh to the world as responsible adults, this movie adds its name to a long list of drama films. What makes a good drama? Three key things to look for in any drama are: conflict, character portrayal, and last, but not least, comic relief. Does this movie have conflict? Any good drama has a conflict in the plot, particularly one that grabs the attention of the audience, and A River Runs Through It is no exception. The main conflict in this film appears to be life itself. The conflict is displayed all throughout the movie, with the struggle of growing up to the struggle of finding your place in this world. The main plot is the conflict of life while the subplots are more about each character doing a little searching of their own. Norman hasShow MoreRelatedRiver Runs Through It1218 Words   |  5 PagesA River Runs Through it A River Runs Through it is a story about the relationship between two brothers. The younger brother Paul has problems. He is a gambler, a drinker, and is short on cash, but his main problem is that he will not allow his older brother, Norman, to help him. Paul refuses to accept his older brothers aid and moreover refuses to even listen to what his brother has to say. In order to make his brother listen Norman will be forced to confront his brother, something that he isRead More A River Runs Through It Essay466 Words   |  2 Pages A River Runs Through It nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;Fly fishing is not what this story is all about, although it might seem so at first. Neither is it about religion, even though the father’s first line is: quot;In our family, there was no clear line between religion and fly fishing.quot; Yes, these two things are themes that run through the story and add to its power. But there is so much more. It depicts a place of beauty, history, myth, and mystery, it is a triangle of earth in Montana whereRead MoreEssay on A River Runs Through It1223 Words   |  5 PagesAll lives revolve around decisions and instances from ones past. In A River Runs Through It (1992), director Robert Redford uses this idea and applies it to a true story of two brothers from Montana, Norman and Paul Maclean (Craig Sheffer and Brad Pitt, respectively). Based on the autobiographical novel by Norman Maclean himself, River uses Maclean’s metaphysical beliefs about life and nature to present its many themes. Using a longing scor e, various film devices, and a story line involving themesRead MoreThe River Runs Through It Essay840 Words   |  4 Pagesfour-count, to something a bit more innovative, shadow casting. The technique wasnt the only thing he altered. He also caught fish for quality, which leaked with palpability when he told Norman he aspired to catch the most prevalent fish in the river. Another exceptionally nontraditional detail about Pauls fishing has to deal with the fact that he took incredible risks. This trait had particular obviousness when he went into the rapids in order to catch the fish of his dreams. TraditionalisticRead More A River Runs Through Us Essay4120 Words   |  17 PagesA River Runs Through Us 1. â€Å"The Anacostia River is a metaphor for the way poor people and minorities are treated† (Hoover). In 1994, the Anacostia River was fourth on the list of American Rivers â€Å"Most Endangered Rivers† (Rynor). Since the late 19 th century the water quality in this river has slowly declined with the onset of urbanization and industrialization and the pollution that accompanies this growth. The Anacostia is severely polluted with â€Å"sediment, nutrients, pathogens, toxinsRead MoreEssay on Norman Macleans A River Runs Through It925 Words   |  4 PagesNorman Macleans A River Runs Through It Throughout A River Runs Through It, Norman Maclean emphasizes the relationship between nature, art, and faith. The concise, simple sentence with which he chooses to open his story captures the essence of all one hundred pages: in his family, there was no clear line between religion and fly fishing (1). Reverend Maclean believes that both fly fishing and spiritual belief are exact arts, if such a term can exist without paradox. The Reverend holdsRead MoreA River Runs Through It - The Importance of Fishing Essay638 Words   |  3 Pagespeople who have read A River Runs through It some time in their life, is a gift. Whether fishermen use bait, worms, or Georges flies it is that much sweeter to catch some trout with a brother under one arm and a father on the other. The river and fishing made such a big impact on the Maclean family that it is the root of this book. The Macleans compared the river to life, went fishing to answer questions, and created a river that has a past full of memories. The river and fishing become metaphorsRead MoreNorman Maclean’s A River Runs Through It Essay1308 Words   |  6 PagesA Hobby or a Way of Life Religion and tradition are two ways that families come together. However in Norman Maclean’s novella, A River Runs Through It, the Maclean family’s devotion to their Presbyterian religion and their tradition of fly-fishing is what undeniably brought the family together. Under the father’s strict Presbyterian values, his sons, Norman and Paul used fly-fishing as the link that brought them closer together and helped them bond with their father on a different level. TheRead MoreAnalysis Of A River Runs Through It By Norman Maclean1736 Words   |  7 Pagestestifies to this power in his novella A River Runs Through It. Through his eulogy to the Blackfoot river Norman Maclean captures the human soul and what it means to grow up, his story explaining how a river affects a man. Robert Redford’s movie adaptation, while maintaining the core importance of the Blackfoot river, focuses on the interpersonal relationships Norman develops throughout his life and how t hose affect his character and life choices. A River Runs through it encapsulates the emotional growthRead MoreAnalysis Of Norman Macfords A River Runs Through It1779 Words   |  8 PagesA River Runs Through It The natural world is unparalleled in its power to make one deeply contemplative, introspective, and observant of the surrounding universe. Norman Maclean testifies to this power in his novella, A River Runs Through It. Through his eulogy to the Blackfoot river, Norman Maclean captures his journey from boy to man through his personal and visceral connection to the Blackfoot. Norman’s writing encapsulates his own coming of age through the symbolism and parallels he draws between

Arizona v. Hicks Supreme Court Case, Arguments, Impact

Arizona v. Hicks (1987) clarified the need for probable cause when seizing evidence in plain view. The United States Supreme Court found that officers must reasonably suspect criminal activity in order for them to lawfully seize items in plain view without a search warrant. Fast Facts: Arizona v. Hicks Case Argued:  December 8, 1986Decision Issued: March 3, 1987Petitioner: State of Arizona, represented by the Assistant Attorney General of Arizona, Linda A. AkersRespondent: James Thomas HicksKey Questions: Is it illegal for a police officer to conduct a warrantless search and seizure of evidence in plain view without probable cause?Majority:  Justices Scalia, Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun, StevensDissenting: Justices Powell, Rehnquist, OConnorRuling: Police officers must have probable cause, even if the evidence they are seizing is in plain view. Facts of the Case On April 18, 1984, a gun was fired in James Thomas Hicks’ apartment. The bullet sailed through the floor and struck an unsuspecting neighbor below. Police officers arrived on the scene to help the injured man, and quickly realized the bullet had come from the apartment above. They entered Hicks’ apartment to locate the shooter, weapon, and any other possible victims. One police officer, referred to in the Supreme Courts ruling as Officer Nelson, noticed high-end stereo equipment that seemed out of place in the otherwise â€Å"squalid† four-room apartment. He moved the items to get a look at their serial numbers so that he could read and report them to headquarters. Headquarters alerted Officer Nelson that one piece of equipment, a turntable, had been stolen in a recent robbery. He seized the item as evidence. Officers later matched some of the other serial numbers to open robbery cases and seized more stereo equipment from the apartment with a warrant. Based on the evidence found in his apartment, Hicks was indicted for robbery. At trial, his attorney motioned to suppress evidence uncovered from the search and seizure of the stereo equipment. The state trial court granted the motion to suppress, and on appeal, the Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed. The Arizona Supreme Court denied review and the U.S. Supreme Court took the case on a petition. Constitutional Issues Coolidge v. New Hampshire had established the â€Å"plain view† doctrine, which allows police to seize evidence of criminal activity that is in plain view. The question posed to the Supreme Court in Arizona v. Hicks was whether or not police first need probable cause to initiate search and seizure of an item in plain view. More specifically, was moving the turntable in Hicks’ apartment to read its serial numbers considered a search under the Fourth Amendment? How does the â€Å"plain view† doctrine affect the legality of the search? Arguments Assistant Attorney General Arizona, Linda A. Akers, argued the case on behalf of the state. In the state’s opinion, the officer’s actions were reasonable and the serial numbers were in plain view. Officer Nelson entered the apartment through legal means to investigate the commission of a crime. The stereo equipment had been left out in plain view, which suggested that Hicks’ had no expectation that the equipment or its serial numbers would be kept private, Akers argued. John W. Rood III argued the case for the petitioner. According to Rood, the stereo equipment was tangential to the reason that officers had entered the apartment. They were searching for evidence of gun violence, not robbery. Officer Nelson acted on a suspicious feeling when he examined the stereo equipment. That feeling was not enough to justify a search and seizure of evidence without a warrant, Rood argued. In order to write down the serial numbers, the officer had to touch the equipment and move it, proving that the numbers were not readily apparent. â€Å"Wherever a policeman’s eye may go, his body need not follow,† Rood told the Court. Majority Ruling Justice Antonin Scalia delivered the 6-3 decision. The majority found that probable cause is required to invoke the plain view doctrine when seizing evidence.   Justice Scalia broke down the case into several separate issues. First, he considered the legality of the initial search. When officers first entered Hicks’ apartment, they did so under exigent (emergency) circumstances. Shots had been fired and they were attempting to apprehend the suspect and evidence of the crime. Thus, the search and seizure of evidence within Hicks’ apartment was valid under the Fourth Amendment, Justice Scalia reasoned. Next, Justice Scalia examined Officer Nelson’s actions once within Hicks’ apartment. The officer noticed the stereo but had to move it to access its serial numbers. This qualified as a search because the serial numbers would have been hidden from sight if Officer Nelson had not repositioned the object. The content of the search was not important, Justice Scalia wrote, because â€Å"a search is a search, even if it happens to disclose nothing but the bottom of a turntable.† Finally, Justice Scalia addressed whether or not the warrantless search was legal under the Fourth Amendment. The officer lacked probable cause to search the stereo equipment, relying only on his â€Å"reasonable suspicion† that it might be stolen, he wrote. This was insufficient to satisfy the requirements of the plain view doctrine. In order to seize something in plain view during a warrantless search, the officer must have probable cause. This means that an officer must have a reasonable belief, based on factual evidence, that a crime has been committed. When Officer Nelson seized the stereo equipment, he had no way of knowing that a theft had occurred or that the stereo equipment could be linked to that theft. Dissent Justices Powell, O’Connor, and Rehnquist dissented. Justice Powell argued that there was little difference between looking at an object and moving it as long as both actions were based on reasonable suspicion. Justice Powell thought Officer Nelson’s suspicion was reasonable because it was based on his factual perception that the stereo equipment seemed out of place. Justice O’Connor suggested that Officer Nelson’s actions constituted more of a â€Å"cursory inspection† rather than a â€Å"full-blown search† and should be justified by reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause. Impact Arizona v. Hicks set a precedent for considering probable cause in relation to plain view. The Court took a â€Å"bright-line† approach to eliminate any uncertainty as to what level of suspicion is required to conduct a search and seizure of evidence in plain view. Privacy advocates applauded the decision because it limited the range of actions a police officer can take when conducting a plain view search of a private residence. Critics of the ruling focused on the fact that it might hinder reasonable law enforcement practices. Despite concerns, the ruling still informs police protocol today. Sources Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 (1987).Romero, Elsie. â€Å"Fourth Amendment: Requiring Probable Cause for Searches and Seizures under the Plain View Doctrine.†Ã‚  The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), vol. 78, no. 4, 1988, p. 763., doi:10.2307/1143407.

Is Science And Pseudoscience - 1744 Words

In this essay I will argue that science and pseudoscience cannot be clearly demarcated: rather that there’s great difficulty and complication on the fringes when asserting strict criteria that distinguishes the two. I will give a brief overview and draw on the arguments made by philosophers of science throughout history and explain why perhaps their criteria are problematic. I will look in depth into ‘creation science’ and why we strongly consider this as pseudoscientific and analyse the more ambiguous peripheries of science such as Freudian psychoanalysis or even economics. Laudan (1983) claimed that the problem of demarcation can be traced back to ancient Greece and Aristotle. Aristotle asserted that from general laws one can deduce scientific theories that are consequently truthful statements. Pseudoscientific theories according to Aristotle are not deductively formulated and therefore cannot be considered scientific. However this method of demarcation is flawed: pseudosciences such as astrology can be vacuously true and most are reluctant to say astrology is scientific. We can already see from this early stage that the distinctions between science and pseudoscience are murky and the formulation of demarcation can be challenging. In the 17th century Francis Bacon introduced induction as the new method for producing scientific theories. However inductive reasoning is riddled with problems that make it unsatisfactory for demarcating science. Hume’s problem of inductionShow MoreRelatedScience Versus Pseudoscience : Science Vs. Pseudoscience774 Words   |  4 PagesBSC 1020 – Homework Unit A Science vs. Pseudoscience This homework is worth 25 points of the 900 points available in the course. Please use the textbook, the PPT lecture handout of Chapter 1, and internet to answer the following six questions: 1) What are the steps of the scientific method? (4 points) The scientific method contains several steps which are as follows. 1. Ask a question 2. Do some background research 3. Create a hypothesis 4. Test your hypothesis by experimentationRead MoreThe Between Good Science And Pseudoscience1491 Words   |  6 Pagesor basic study. 5. Psychoanalyst → Trained in therapeutic approach started by Freud. Pg. 33, Looking Back 1. How does â€Å"psychobabble† differ from serious psychology? To tell the difference between good science and pseudoscience, one must look at the basic characteristics of each. Pseudoscience, or â€Å"psychobabble†, hooks people on the basis of confirmation in popular beliefs. It utilizes the art of wording and creates a pretty veneer of scientific actuality, when in reality, the branches it entailsRead MoreThe New Science of Pseudoscience2014 Words   |  8 Pagesmorality of the institution of slavery. Pro-slavery advocates had to find new ways of justifying their beliefs in order to provide a different perspective from which to view slavery, other than an economic standpoint. Southern society began to idealize science as an indisputable vehicle of objective truth. The rapid advancement of scientific knowledge lent scientists a â€Å"halo,† as they could claim neutrality and objectiveness. A scientist’s word was law and deemed worthy of imitation. Because of the beliefRead MoreDifferences Between Science And Pseudoscie nce1526 Words   |  7 Pagesscientific theory 1.5.The difference between science and Pseudoscience is a deceptive practice that uses appearance or language of science to convince, confuse, or mislead people into thinking that something has scientific validity, while science is the process used to solve problems or develop an understand of repetitive natural events that involve knowledge and the test of possible answers. 1.6.Political science is not a science because political science is the study of power in states and societiesRead MoreScience And Pseudoscience From Ben Goldacre s Bad Science Essay1954 Words   |  8 Pages1. Science and Pseudoscience One of the interesting things I have learned from Ben Goldacre’s Bad Science is how significant it is to know the difference between science and pseudoscience. As Goldacre discusses, most people see science as an authority not a method (Goldacre, page 3); so they mistakenly confuse market-based pseudoscientific products with science. Science is about experimental methods and testing specific hypothesis by controlling conditions to see the effects of studied factors. PseudoscienceRead MoreScience Should Progress Through Falsification And Demarcation As A Way For Distinguish Real Scientific Theories From Pseudoscience1785 Words   |  8 PagesPopper believes science should progress through falsification and demarcation as a way to distinguish real scientific theories from pseudoscience. (A. Popper) Falsification is how a scientist should look at a problem they are attempting to solve instead of using existing theories and treating them as scientific laws you should instead try and prove existing theories wrong using emperical evidence to solve the questions being asked. (A. Popper) believes Science keeps moving forward and the only wayRead MorePseudoscience Is A Form Of Bad Reasoning1442 Words   |  6 PagesPseudoscience Pseudoscience is a form of bad reasoning because it lacks empirical evidence. It disregards the scientific method and is usually unreliable. Some examples of pseudoscience are astrology, hypnosis, and polygraph tests. Although science is a factor in each of these examples, they are not justifiable because the results cannot be replicated. By learning more about pseudoscience, we can recognize illogical thinking and prevent it. Pseudoscience not only causes irrational reasoning, itsRead MoreThe Differences Between Science And Science848 Words   |  4 Pages Carey explains science to be genuine as well as having the use of rigorous testing of ideas using the scientific method to get results, this is usually done through an investigation (2012, p. 123). Pseudoscience is any type of method or theories, such as astrology, that is considered to not have a scientific basis (2015). Pseudoscience doesn’t follow the scientific method like science does. It sticks with evidence that is found instead of figuring out if it is acclaimed in the natural world. MajorityRead MoreAnalysis Of The Qray Bracelet : Pseudoscience1175 Words   |  5 PagesThe QRay Bracelet: Pseudoscience In 1973, Manuel L. Polo, a chiropractor in Spain, supposedly developed an ionized bracelet that, using the body’s â€Å"Qi,† would make a person healthier and overall live a more balanced lifestyle (Barrett, 2008). In 1983, Que Te â€Å"Andrew† Park, along with QT Incorporated, expanded on the idea and invented the QRay bracelet (Carroll, 2015). The bracelet is in a â€Å"C-shape† and is made out of metal – silver, gold, titanium, etc. The design allegedly creates a similar effectRead MoreThe Gap Between Scientist And Practitioner990 Words   |  4 Pagesfield of clinical psychology and its scientific foundations. Pseudoscience and science differ in degree, rather than type as there are several blurred boundaries between the two. While the exact difference may be indistinct, the article lists ten indicators to help make this distinction more clear. Assertions that could never be proven false, known as ad hoc hypotheses, is a common method to explain any negative findings in pseudoscience. These ad hoc hypotheses are typically just added to plug any

Defining the Humanities free essay sample

Many of these musical terms and concepts that were developed in this era are still being used today (Firer, 2011). The baroque periods was recognized for their order and elaborate culture and polished nature. All of these characteristics are very apparent from listening to the works of Antonio Vivaldi , Johann Sebastian Bach and George Frederic Handel. (Firer, 2011) Comparison of other Art Forms When the music that was heard at the orchestra performance was compared to there music from that same era along with other architecture or paintings it was noticed that all bore similar attributes.These attributes include but are not limited to being flamboyant, and elaborately ornamental with extensive ornamentation and detail (Firer, 2011). The music from the baroque era was centered around the needs of churches, which at that time relied on the theatrical attributes of art to make Ownership more appealing and attractive. The art, sculpture and painting from the arouse era also showed the artists passion for intricacy and beauty. We will write a custom essay sample on Defining the Humanities or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Such painting and other art forms such as sculptures include works created by Rembrandt, Velazquez, and Poisson (Firer, 2011). Architecture includes elaborate buildings and churches and one of the most elaborate of this era is Versailles Palace in France. Conclusion Europe underwent several periods dating back from the medieval era to the present. The medieval era ended and ushered in the Renaissance era.